LAWS(RAJ)-2009-11-79

LALIT KUMAR BAIRWA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Decided On November 17, 2009
LALIT KUMAR BAIRWA Appellant
V/S
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner submitted application in pursuance to an advertisement dt. 31/05/2008 issued by the respondents for holding selection on the post of Prabodhak which is included in the scheduled appended to the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008. Alongwith application form all required documents were annexed by the petitioner in regard to his academic qualification as also of experience which is of more than 5 years of a recognized educational institution but the teaching experience was not considered to be valid on the premise that there was a break in service on account of summer vacation as he did not discharge duties during intervening period which was considered by the respondents as a break in service. Taking note thereof, his candidature was rejected on the premises that he was not holding 5 years of continuous teaching experience from a recognized institution.

(2.) IT has been brought to the notice of this Court that the coordinate Bench of this Court, while deciding CWP-5951/2008 alongwith connected bunch of petitions, which were decided by a common judgment dt. 07/01/2009, has taken note of the controversy which has been raised in the instant petitions in Para NO. 11 of the judgment and finally observed that period of summer vacation/medical leave will not be treated as break in service while computing five years continuous teaching experience as referred to under the Scheme of Rules of 2008. The extract of the judgment dt. 07/01/2009, which deals with the issue in question, referred in Paras No. 11, 12 and 13 of the judgment, referred to (supra) is quoted here as under:- Similarly, period of summer vacation cannot be treated as a break in service as during this period the employee remains out of employment due to the circumstances beyond his control. As such, non-consideration of the candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment as Prabodhak on the count that he is lacking experience is not just and proper and for the purpose of calculating the requisite experience, the period of summer vacation be counted in teaching experience. Similar controversy has already been resolved by the coordinate Bench of the Jodhpur High Court vide judgment dated 15.10.2008 rendered in th case of Beeram Ram Choudhary Vs. State&Ors. (SBCWP No. 6273/2008).