MAHESH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 'Shock therapy' to anti social 'pirates', for deterrence to crimes of primitive horror. Inhuman and barbaric nature, is the day. This judges have duty for suppressing grievous injustice to humanist values by inflicting condign punishments on dangerous deviants, has persuaded this court to do the unpleasant duty to inflict maximum sentence of imprisonment for life in this extreme case of mass blinding reminding 'Dara Shika' medieval dark days.

(2.) THIS therapy of Justice Iyer, 'Sarkaria' innovation in Parasram's case (1981) 2 CC 684, 713 pleaded for 'Shocktherapy' to such anti social 'piety for deterrence to crimes of primitive horror, barbaric and inhuman nature. Iyer Sarkaria J. termed the duty of a Judge to give such deterrent sentence as 'high duty' for suppressing grievous injustice to humanist values by Inflicting condign punishments on dangerous deviants and observed:

(3.) WHILE in the first, activist approach of Apex Court's outcome, is series of Judicial orders and classical judgments: : (1981)1SCC622 Anil Yacdav v. State of Bihar (1981) 1 SCC 623 Khatri -I v. State of Bihar; : 1981CriLJ597 Khatri II v. State of Bihar : AIR1981SC928a Khatri -JU v. State of Bihar; : [1981]3SCR145 Khatri -IV v. State of Bihar; and : 1982CriLJ982 Anil Yadav v. State of Bihar.