SURENDRA KUMAR Vs. HEMANT GUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Miscellaneous Application has been moved with the prayer that the order dated 27.01.2006 passed by this Court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.379/2006 may be recalled. The said order in its entirety reads thus,-

(2.) It has been submitted in the instant application that the Board of Revenue has directed for expeditious disposal of the suit within four months but the respondents No.1 and 2 are not interested in such expeditious disposal and have sought repeated transfer of the matter with the result that ultimately the matter is now pending before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Jodhpur and therein next date has been fixed as 21.08.2006; and that the petitioners have moved review application before the Board of Revenue on 02.06.2006 and have also moved application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC that is also pending before the Board. According to the petitioners, the respondents No.1 and 2 have filed a wholly baseless and incompetent suit and they seek to cause irreparable injury to the petitioners in the manner that the proposed construction of college building may not be completed and resultantly the permission may be refused by the Dental Council putting the future of 400 students in jeopardy. Citing these reasons and circumstances, the petitioners have prayed for recalling of the order dated 27.01.2006 and for hearing of the writ petition on merits.

(3.) Having heard learned counsel Mr. G.R.Goyal in support of this application and having examined the record of the case, this Court is clearly of opinion that the present application is entirely misconceived and deserves to be rejected.