NASIR KHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner was initially appointed as Driver on 11.08.64 in the work -charge establishment. The respondent State has decided to give regular pay -scale to the work -charged employees who have completed 10 years of service and to fix their pay -scale in the pay -scales of 1976. In pursuance of the decision taken by the State, the petitioner's services were regularised on the post of Driver on his completion of 10 years of service vide order dated 18.06.91. Later on, by order dated 23.04.92, the petitioner was given selection -grade and fixed in the pay -scale of Rs. 1200 -2050 with effect from 01.09.88 and a sum of Rs. 5,964/ -was paid to him by way of arrears. On 04.05.92, an order has been issued by the Additional Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bikaner Region, Bikaner withdrawing the order dated 23.04.92 whereby the petitioner was given the selection -grade and amount of arrears was paid to him. It is said -in the order that the matter regarding sanction of selection -grade in the pay -scale of Rs. 1200 -2050 to the work -charged cadre is under consideration and selection -grade was wrongly given to the petitioner. The authority directed that in case payment has already been made to the petitioner recovery thereof be effected in suitable instalments. In consequence of the withdrawal of the order dated 23.04.92, respondent No. 3 Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Bikaner, vide his order dated 12.05.92 directed recovery of Rs. 5,964/ -in monthly installments of Rs. 600/ -each. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of withdrawal of selection -grade and the subsequent order of recovery of the amount paid to him.

(2.) ACCORDING to the respondents, the selection -grade was given to the petitioner by order dated 24.04.92 erroneously as no selection -grade was sanctioned for the work -charge cadre to which the petitioner belonged and the matter is only under consideration. As no selection -grade is applicable nor sanctioned to the work -charged employees of the State Government, when the mistake was detected the order giving selection -grade to the petitioner had to be withdrawn and, as a consequence thereof, the order of recovery of the amount already paid to the petitioner by way of arrears was passed.

(3.) ADMITTEDLY , the petitioner has been assigned the status of a permanent work -charged employee and the effect of declaring the petitioner as permanent carries with it certain benefits such as he shall be given the pay -scale as provided under Rule 12 of the Rules of 1964, he will be entitled to increments under Rule 13 and dearness -allowance etc. under Rule 14. Similarly, he is entitled to the benefit of leave as given in Rule 15 and necessary other facilities like medical -facility under Rule 21 and provident -fund under Rule 22 of the Rules of 1964. Under Rule 12 the work -charged staff having separate emoluments of pay and dearness -allowances, as are admissible to the regular employees of the Government, their pay shall be allowed in the revised pay -scale applicable to a regular employee of the Government, performing similar duties, or work -charged staff given consolidated wages without separate element of dearness allowance but whose consolidated wages are fixed on the analogy of total emoluments admissible to regular government employees together with provision for regular increments, shall be paid wages at the rate of consolidated wages corresponding with the revised pay -scale of regular employees of the government performing similar duties alongwith dearness allowance. Thus he shall be entitled to a regular pay -scale equal to that of a regular employee of the government performing the similar duties. But, this does not speak of selection -grade.