RAM GOPAL & OTHERS Vs. SHRI HANUMAN BALIKA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, RATANGARH & OTHERS
LAWS(RAJ)-1984-5-34
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on
May 18,1984
Ram Gopal And Others
Appellant
VERSUS
Shri Hanuman Balika Higher Secondary School, Ratangarh And Others
Respondents
Referred Judgements :-
NARAYANASWAMI V. EGAPPA [REFERRED TO]C. S. DESAI V. PAUL ABRAO [REFERRED TO]
<RC>1985 RAJCRIC 368</RC> RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT <JGN>K.S. LODHA</JGN> <AT>S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 409 OF 1983 (AGAINST THE ORDER OF SHRI R.K. CHACHAN,ADDL. CHIEF JUDL. MAGISTRATE,RATANGARH,DATED 12-10-83 IN PRIVATE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 345/83).</AT> 18.05.1984 18.5.1984 RAM GOPAL & OTHERS SHRI HANUMAN BALIKA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUNATH V. GHISA RAM [REFERRED TO]
SASHADHAR ACHARJYA VS. SIR CHARLES TEGART [REFERRED TO]
JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)C. S. Desai Vs. Paul Abrao, 1963 K,L.T. 548. Narayanaswami Vs. Egappa, 1962 (2) Cri. L. J. 616. Raghunath Vs. Ghisa Ram, 1976 Raj. Cr. Cases 29. Sashadhar Vs. Sir Charles Tekart, AIR1931 Cal. 646.
(2.)K.S. Lodha, J. - I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
(3.)The petitioners have challenged the order of the learned Addl. Chief Judl. Magistrate, Ratangarh, dated 12.10.83 by which the learned Magistrate has found that a joint complaint for an offence u/s 500 I.P.C. is maintainable and by other part of the order, he has refused exemption from attendance prayed for by the accused persons, who are the petitioners in this case.
(2.)K.S. Lodha, J. - I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
(3.)The petitioners have challenged the order of the learned Addl. Chief Judl. Magistrate, Ratangarh, dated 12.10.83 by which the learned Magistrate has found that a joint complaint for an offence u/s 500 I.P.C. is maintainable and by other part of the order, he has refused exemption from attendance prayed for by the accused persons, who are the petitioners in this case.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.