SURENDRA KUMAR GARG Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated August 26, 2003, by which he dismissed the writ petition of the appellant-petitioners on the grounds that to settle the scores against respondent No. 3- Smt. Surta Devi the lady Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, the petition has been filed, and she is indulged in forgery and prepared forged documents, the petitioner-appellants are free to move a No Confidence Motion against her. Apart from that, the petitioner- appellants are not directly affected by the order of the State Government.

(2.) AGGRIEVED by the aforesaid order of the learned Single Judge, the instant appeal has been filed.

(3.) SO far as other ground is concerned, we have examined the matter at length and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Single Judge has rightly arrived at the conclusion that the concerned persons have no locus standi. Learned Single Judge has also rightly observed that if the petitioner-appellants feel that Respondent No. 3-a lady Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat Renwal Maji, District Jaipur, is indulged in corrupt practices, they are free to move a no-confidence motion against her, but an attempt to file a politically motivated writ petition, in order to settle their scores against respondent No. 3-the lady Sarpanch of the aforesaid Gram Panchayat and to get her ousted from the elected Office of the Sarpanch is difficult to appreciate. Apart from that, the petition was not a bona fide one and even the petitioner- appellants are not directly affected by the impugned order of the State Government. That being the position, we are not inclined to make any interference with the order of the learned Single Judge. The special appeal stands dismissed. .