JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)MR . R.K. Soni, learned standing counsel for Mining Department is present in Court, is directed to accept notice on behalf
of respondents. Copy of writ petition may be supplied to him during
the course of day.
(2.)BY way of present writ petition, the petitioner has sought following relief:
"It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that by an appropriate writ, order or direction the writ petition filed by the petitioner may kidly be allowed with cost and the order dated 11.9.2012 (Annexure-11) may kindly be quashed and set aside, further consequential orders/letters/ proceedings may also be set aside pursuant to the order dated 11.9.2012, the respondents may also be set aside pursuant to the order dated 11.9.2012, the respondents may kindly be directed to make available has been shown due and has been adjusted by taking the Fixed Deposit Receipts of the petitioner, pledged with them, and amount is excess with them then same may be refunded with interest to the petitioner."
Mr. Arjun Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the additional dues of the contract amount, which
contract was given to him for collection of royalty for the period
01.04.2010 to 31.03.2012, has now been issued by the respondent- Mining Department on account of increase of rate of royalty but the
same deserves to be adjusted against the FDR/s already given by
way of security to the Department.
(3.)A bare perusal of order Annex.10 dated 14.08.2012 shows that such FDR No.709254 dated 20.03.2010 of Rs.2,75,000.00
and FDR No.710315 dated 03.03.2010 of Rs.1,14,000.00, total
Rs.3,89,000.00 have already been adjusted by the respondent-Mining
Department but learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that there
were more FDR(s) for such security lying with the respondent Mining
Department, however, they have not been adjusted and the
respondent- Mining Department is insisting upon the payment in cash
of such difference amount. There is no dispute on the fact that
difference amount of contracted sum is due to be paid by the
petitioner since as per the terms of the contract increased amount
was payable upon increase in the rate of royalty.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.