MANGI LAL GURJAR Vs. BHARAT PALIWAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.04.2010 passed by the District Judge, Rajsamand, whereby the learned Judge has allowed the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and has impleaded the present petitioner who was a subsequent purchaser of the property in dispute as party-defendant.

(2.) THE brief facts of the case are that respondent No.1, Bharat Paliwal, submitted an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the learned Judge. In the application, he claimed on 03.10.2011 that he and respondent No.2, Bhagwan Lal had entered into an agreement to sell a piece of land for a consideration of Rs.25 lacs. As part payment of the consideration, Rs.1 lac was paid to respondent No.2, Bhagwan Lal. Subsequently, he approached Bhagwan Lal for getting the sale deed registered. But, Bhagwan Lal declined to get the registration of the sale-deed done. Since there was an arbitration clause in the agreement to sell, he approached to the arbitrator for initiation of arbitration proceedings.

(3.) HENCE, this Court does not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. This petition is devoid of any merit; it is, hereby, dismissed.