HANUMAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ISSUE notice. Learned PP accepts notice on behalf of State.

(2.) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard and finally decided.

(3.) RELYING on a decision of Jaipur Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 1996 Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 101, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the condition imposed on the petitioner whereby he has to submit a bank guarantee of Rs.4 lakhs, is unjustified and onerous condition and amounts to an abuse of process of Court. It is submitted that apart from this condition, other stringent conditions have already been imposed and, therefore, there is no justification to impose the condition of furnishing the bank guarantee.