(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) THE two courts below have concurrently rejected the application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 C.P.C. in the suit for permanent injunction.
(3.) BOTH the Courts below have found that no evidence was produced by the plaintiff - petitioner showing agreement of purchase entered into by her and on the contrary the agreement produced by the defendants showed that the said agreement was entered into only on 10.12.2007 with Prakash Chaudhary and by forging the said agreement, the plaintiff had inserted her name as party No. 1 in the said agreement.