SONAULLAH DAR Vs. STATE OF J&K
LAWS(J&K)-1999-12-27
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Decided on December 01,1999

Sonaullah Dar Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JANDK Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Petitioner initially a daily-wager with Executive Engineer Mechanical Engineering Division Baramulla was appointed and regularised as helper in the same Mechanical Division. He alleges that on his representation the Govt. transferred and posted petitioner in PHE Division Budgam for a period of one year vide order No. 261-PW of 1999 dated 13.10.1999. However, this order is not being implemented by respondents. He made a representation which is still pending as the representation is not considered. He seeks mandamus for compelling respondent Govt. officials to comply with the Govt. order.
(2.) Mr. Qadiri, counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents 2 and 3 of Mechanical Engineering Department and respondents 4 and 5 of Public Health Engineering Department, having failed to give effect to the order has pushed petitioner to the point where he had to file this writ.
(3.) The order of transfer on its face appears to be an order of transfer on deputation from Mechanical Division Baramulla to PHE Division Budgam for a period of one year maintaining the lien and seniority of petitioner in his parent department. The order does not ipso-facto confer any legal right on petitioner. It is just like an order of transfer subject to the conditions specified under Regulation 52(B) of C.S.Rs. The relief of implementation of such an order of an employee inter se departments of Govt. cannot be countenanced by the writ court, in so far as no legal rights of petitioner have been violated. It may confer benefit on petitioner, but creates no rights in his favour. There is no obligation or duty cast on the respondents to rush through to implement such an order. Though petitioner has represented before respondents 2 and 3, he should have been better placed by making representation against the alleged in-action of connecerned officer(s) to his/their high-ups qua implementation of the order of the State Govt. (respondent No. 1), which has issued the order. After all implementation of its orders is prime concern and responsibility of the Govt. It is for the Govt. to look after its interest and to subserve interest of its administration. As custodian of public interest, the Government has to ensure that its orders are carried out and honoured by its officials including middle and lower rung officers, faithfully, as committed disciplined members of the services. The representation of the petitioner has to be considered by the competent authority(s) and disposed of promptly, if health, interest and discipline of administration is to be maintained. In the wider spectrum, such course is normaly dictated by public interest and good governance.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.