AB SHAKOOR Vs. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION
Click here to view full judgement.
ARUN KUMAR GOEL, J. -
(1.) PETITIONERS questioned the order passed by respondent No.1 in a file No. 5/97 -98, dated 1/7/97, rejecting application u/s 18 of the Land
acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to the Act), and requiring the said
respondent to refer the matter for determination by the court so far it
(2.) CASE of the petitioners as projected in the writ petition is that award in this case appears to have been finalised on 3l/8/96. After
receipt of notice under sections 9 and 9 - A of the Act vide Annexure -A to
the writ petition, claim was filed by them before the authority concerned
in response to it vide Annexure -B. It appears that proceedings finally
terminated in the finalisation of the award supra by the respondent No. 1.
(3.) COPY of this award is annexed by the respondents alongwith their objections to this writ petition as Annexure R -1. A reference to it
indicates that there is nothing on record to suggest whether any of the
petitioners and or their attorney was present at the time when it was
pronounced. In addition to this there is also nothing on the file
attached by the respondents alongwith their objections to indicate that
notice of award was issued to any of the petitioners as required under
Petitioners submit that they came to know of the passing of the impugned award on 19th March. 1997 when their attorney after he had gone
to the office of the respondent No. 1 to enquire about proceedings.
Amount was received vide acquitance role on 19/3/97 by the attorney
holder under protest. An application was filed claiming Rs. 60,000/ - per
kanal while objecting to the grant of Rs. 25,000/ - per kanal, failing
which prayer was made that matter was referred to the arbitrator for
adjudication. This is the substance of the application under section 18
of the Act. In these circumstances further case of the petitioners is
that from the date they came to know (in the absence of notice being
issued by the respondent No.1) regarding passing of impugned award,
reference application is well within time and therefore impugned order
dated 1/7/97 Annexure -E to the writ petition was liable to be quashed.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.