JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THERE is no denial to the fact that there are set rules, for making appointments to civil posts, which broadly speaking require that when any
vacant post is required to be filled, the appointing authority is to fill
it up through open competition by inviting applications, conducting
tests/ examinations and/ or interviews. Rules have from time to time been
promulgated governing the procedure for making appointments to the posts
in the civil service of the Union of India or the State services. There
is an exception to these provisions providing for appointment to the
civil posts/ civil services. Provisions have been made for giving gainful
appointments to one of the dependents of the deceased governments/ state
employee who dies in harness.
(2.) THE object underlying the provisions for grant of compassionate appointment is to enable the family of the deceased employee to tide over
the sudden crisis resulting from the death of the bread earner, which
leaves the family in penury and without an means of livelihood. Out of
pure humanitarian considerations and having regard to the fact that
unless some source of livelihood is provided, the family of the deceased
employee would not be able to make both ends meet. A provision is
therefore, made for giving gainful employment to one of the dependents of
the deceased who may be eligible for such appointment. Such a provisions
makes a departure from the general provisions governing appointment on
the posts by following a particular procedure. Compassionate appointment
being in nature an exception to the general provisions care has to be
taken that the grant of compassionate appointment does not unduly
interfere with the right of other persons, who are eligible for
appointment, to seek employment against a post.
(3.) IN the case Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs. State of Haryana, 1994 (4) SCC 138, the Apex Court held that the government or the appointing
authority concerned is to examine financial condition of the family of
the deceased and it is only if it is satisfied that, but for the
provision of employment, the family will not be able to meet the crisis
that a job is to be offered to the eligible member of the family.
The object of compassionate appointment is as said above, to grant relief against the destitution. Compassionate appointment cannot be
claimed or made as a matter of right. It is to be remembered that as
against the destitute family of decease employee, there are millions of
other families which are equally, if not more destitute The exception to
the rule made in favour of the family of the deceased employee is in
consideration of the services rendered by him but also primarily to
provide a relief against destitution which is suddenly faced by the
family of the deceased employee.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.