ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Vs. OMKAR SINGH
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) ORIENTAL Insurance Company has approached this Court under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to question award dated 31.12.2002 of Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ramban, awarding an amount of Rs.71,000/ -
(Rupees seventy one thousand) to claimant/respondent No.3, alongwith
interest @ 7% per annum.
(2.) SH . Vishnu Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company, questioned the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal
to Mst. Sakeena Begum for the injuries received by her on 31.03.2001,
when a goods vehicle bearing registration No.PB06 -5277 driven by Omkar
Singh from Srinagar to Jammu, hit Mst. Sakeena Begum at Chanderkote.
(3.) SH . O. P. Thakur, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3/claimant, raised a preliminary objection that the appeal by the
Insurance Company may not be maintainable as the Company had not sought
requisite permission under Section 170 to contest the claim petition on
defences, which could have been raised by the owner and the driver of the
vehicle. Sh. Thakur relies on 'National Insurance Co. Ltd., Chandigarh v.
Nicolletta Rohtagi & Ors. reported as 2002 (6) Supreme 362.
Sh. Vishnu Gupta relied upon 'National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bashir Ahmad Gojri and others reported as 2000 ACJ 1108, a Single Judge
judgment of this Court holding that the permission under Section 170 of
the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, will be deemed to have been granted if the
Insurance Company had been permitted to cross -examine the witnesses on
all those defences, which were available to owner/driver of the vehicle,
regardless of its having not been specifically permitted by the Tribunal
so to do.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.