SHAFIQA BEGUM Vs. STATE OF J&K
LAWS(J&K)-2006-11-43
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Decided on November 07,2006

Shafiqa Begum Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JANDK Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) THE case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as a Sweeper in the year 1977 vide order dt. 10th of Feb77 passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, National Highway, Forest Division, Batote. It is stated that the petitioner was thereafter adjusted against a newly created post of Sweeper on monthly salary of Rs. 150/ -. Thereafter the pay of the petitioner was fixed in the regular grade of Rs. 345 -460 in terms of SRO No. 91 of 1982. It is further stated that in the year 1991, the petitioner was given the benefit of revised pay scale of Rs. 750 -940/ - and the arrears of the salary were also released in favour of the petitioner. It is stated that the petitioner is now drawing her salary in the grade of Rs. 2550 -3200/ -. The petitioner earlier filed a writ petition bearing SWP No. 536/97, which was disposed of with a direction that respondents would treat the same as a notice of demand and after considering the case of the petitioner shall take a decision within a period of three months. In pursuance of the aforesaid order passed by this court, the claim of the petitioner was considered and the same has been rejected vide order dt. 3rd of Sept 01, passed by respondent No.2, on the ground that the petitioner is a part time sweeper and the post against which she is working is on consolidated basis and not a regular one. It is this order which is being impugned in the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir and the petitioner has made the following substantive prayers: - - (i) that the writ in the nature of Certiorari be issued for quashing order dated 3.9.2001 as passed by respondent No.2 whereunder claims put forth by the petitioner have been rejected. (ii) and that issuing writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondents to treat the petitioner as a regularized class IV employee with effect from 1.1.82 and pay her all consequential benefits of annual increments.
(2.) ON notice, respondents have filed objections in which it is stated that the petitioner was engaged as a part time sweeper vide order dt. 10th of Feb77 at the rate of Rs.40/ - per month. The petitioner was then adjusted against a sanctioned post of Sweeper in Forest Division, Batote on consolidated pay of Rs.150/ - per month and the petitioner performed the duties from 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. only. It is further pleaded that due to inadvertence and some misunderstanding the then Divisional Forest Officer, Batote had released the minimum basic grade in her favour in total violation of the Government Order and that mis -understanding does not vest any right with the petitioner to claim regularization or to claim that the petitioner stands regularized
(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record The question which arises for consideration in this petition is whether the petitioner was holding regular appointment in the service of the State government. Admittedly, the petitioner was initially appointed on part time basis but subsequently, she was placed in the regular grade by the Conservator of Forest, Chenab Circle, Jammu, by passing following order: - - @TBLCEN = OFFICE OF THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS CHENAB CIRCLE JAMMU DFO/Batote No.552 Dt.7.2.85 Subject: Monthly salary to Safai wala. Ref. Your No. 3873 -74 dt. 15.1.1985. Please refer to SRO No. 91 of 1982 and SRO No. 350 dt. 21.8.1982 and take action accordingly. The pay is to be regularized in the grade of 345 -460. Sd/ - Conservator of Forests Chenab Circle, Jammu ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.