JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THROUGH this petition the petitioner/appellant seeks condonation of more than 6 years and 4 months delay involved in institution of firs,
appeal against the Bank Court decree for an amount of Rs. 2, 19,
41,911.50 purported to have been awarded against them on 16.2.1998 in ex -parte. Despite opportunities nobody has appeared for respondent/Bank
on two consecutive hearing even while they were furnished a copy of the
petition on 9.6.2005 with direction to file objections within three weeks
there from.
(2.) HOWEVER , grounds pleaded in support of the petition are that appellant/petitioner acquired knowledge of aforesaid ex -parte decree on
27.11.1998 and filed an application under Or. 9 R. 13 CPC on 2.12.1998 alongwith an application for condonation of delay involved therein. In
response to notice respondent No.2 entered appearance and sought time for
filing objections which was however not done despite many opportunities
even while petitioners counsel continued to appear till 4.9.2000. Still
then the application for condonation of delay was some time before that
wrongly dismissed in default regarding which petitioner filed an
application for restoration which was dismissed by trial court on
31.10.2001. Order of trial court was challenged by petitioner through a Civil Revision which was dismissed on 8.5.2003 against which the
petitioners took a Latters Patent Appeal which too was ultimately
dismissed on 20.7.2004 whereafter the Governing Board of
petitioner/Corporation decided to file this appeal alongwith the petition
for condonation of delay involved. During course of his submissions the
petitioners counsel while reiterating contents of petition has submitted
that delay involved in the matter was purely attributable to the over
sight committed by trial court in dismissing his condonation application
(pertaining to application filed by him under Or. 9 R.I3 CPC for setting
aside order of trial court) which as a matter of fact triggered a chain
of litigation as aforesaid which ultimately resulted in late institution
of this appeal. Since respondents have not chosen to file objections to
petitioners application and anybody is present on their behalf to be
heard in the matter, there is virtually nothing on record to rebut the
factual and other pleas taken by petitioner, with the result that the
whole matter has got to be considered on petitioners pleadings and
submissions.
(3.) LAW is well settled that ordinarily the parties should be left to contest their causes on merits rather than allowing procedural
technicalities to come in the way of substantial hearing of disputes
particularly those like the present which involves extremely high stakes.
It would be appropriate to recall that the petitioners have suffered an
exparte decree for more than rupees two crores with 20% interest per
annum awarded thereupon and chargeable on quarterly rests which would
mean an annual addition of nearly Rs. 50.00 lacs to the decretal amount
while the total loan obtained by petitioner/Corporation in 1984 appears
to have been Rs. 40, 00,000/ - only. It would be needless to say that
petitioner/corporation being a public undertaking; the matter involves
the interest of State exchequer also which fact further recommends
consideration of the matter on its merit rather than throwing out the
petitioner/appellant on mere technicalities. At the same time, however,
the legitimate interest of respondent even while they are unrepresented
has to be taken care of.
In backdrop of circumstances catalogued and with a view to facilitate hearing of this appeal on merits, the delay involved in its
institution is condoned on the condition that appellants shall deposit
the amount of Rs. 40,00,000/ - i.e. the amount stated to have been,
borrowed by them from respondent/Bank, in this Court within a period of
eight weeks from now alongwith costs of Rs. 10,000/ - to be deposited in
(AWF) S/B A/C No. 1476 in J&K Bank Extension Counter, High Court,
Srinagar within same period of time. After deposit of amount aforesaid
and the costs, the main appeal be listed on an early date.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.