AVER POTOPRINT SYSTEM Vs. RAMAKRISHNA AUTO COLOUR LAB
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVER POTOPRINT SYSTEM
RAMAKRISHNA AUTO COLOUR LAB
Click here to view full judgement.
P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU,PRESIDENT -
(1.) THIS review petition
is filed by the opposite party stating that the second complainant has
written a letter to the opposite party that he is not entitled to claim
any relief in the complaint, but the complaint was filed only to save
himself from the State Financial Corporation. But this letter was not
filed when the C.D. was taken up by this Commission. The learned Counsel
for the petitioner, however, submits that the complainants played fraud
and obtained order dated 3.7.2002 and as such this Commission has power
to review its order, as orders obtained by playing fraud cannot be
sustained. Orders obtained by playing fraud on the Court cannot be
sustained as fraud and justice cannot go together. But if fraud is played
against one party or the other, he has to safe -guard himself by bringing
it to the notice of the Court. As it is not done at the appropriate time,
we do not think that we have power to review our order even if the
allegation is true.
Hence, this application is misconceived and it is accordingly dismissed.
Review Petition dismissed. ;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.