AVER POTOPRINT SYSTEM Vs. RAMAKRISHNA AUTO COLOUR LAB
LAWS(APCDRC)-2003-8-3
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Decided on August 20,2003

AVER POTOPRINT SYSTEM Appellant
VERSUS
RAMAKRISHNA AUTO COLOUR LAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU,PRESIDENT - (1.) THIS review petition is filed by the opposite party stating that the second complainant has written a letter to the opposite party that he is not entitled to claim any relief in the complaint, but the complaint was filed only to save himself from the State Financial Corporation. But this letter was not filed when the C.D. was taken up by this Commission. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the complainants played fraud and obtained order dated 3.7.2002 and as such this Commission has power to review its order, as orders obtained by playing fraud cannot be sustained. Orders obtained by playing fraud on the Court cannot be sustained as fraud and justice cannot go together. But if fraud is played against one party or the other, he has to safe -guard himself by bringing it to the notice of the Court. As it is not done at the appropriate time, we do not think that we have power to review our order even if the allegation is true. Hence, this application is misconceived and it is accordingly dismissed. Review Petition dismissed. ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.