JUDGEMENT
M.Shreesha -
(1.)Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.136/2005 on the file of District Forum,
Karimnagar, opposite party No.1 preferred F.A.No.538/2007 and opposite
party No.3 preferred F.A.No.650/2007. Since both the appeals arise out of
the same C.D., they are being disposed of by a common order.
(2.)The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that complainant No.1 is
the daughter and complainant No.2 was the husband of late Subhadra who
died on 11-6-2004 on account of negligence in treatment of opposite
parties 1 and 2. The deceased Subhadra became pregnant in the month of
December, 2003 and was under prenatal treatment of opposite party No.1
and taking treatment regularly as advised. During the course of the
treatment, opposite party No.1 advised the deceased to undergo scanning
and on undergoing the same on 30-5-2004, opposite party no.1 confirmed
that she was carrying twins and informed the due date of delivery as
3-7-2004. The deceased consulted opposite party no.1 periodically and
opposite party No.1 prescribed medicines and informed the complainant and
parents of the deceased that every thing was normal and the deceased
would have a normal delivery. The deceased used to complain severe
backache and opposite party No.1 had not given attention to the said
problem and ignored Edema and Blood pressure that the deceased developed
during pregnancy. Opposite party No.1 failed to find out for a period of
6 months that the deceased was carrying twins and did not take proper
care and was negligent in treating the deceased right from the time the
deceased consulted her for the first time in the month of May, 2004. On
11-6-2004 the deceased complained of severe pain in abdomen and was
immediately taken to the first opposite party who did not conduct any
pathological tests and not bothered to know about the cause for the
ailment and after examining referred to Dr.Mallesham of Tirumala
Hospital, Peddapalli to get bleed report. The said doctor conducted the
blood test and with that report the deceased approached opposite party
no.1 and opposite party No.1 after going through the reports refused to
admit the deceased in her nursing home without assigning any reason and
when the attendants requested her to provide the necessary life saving
medical aid till she was given to some other hospital, opposite party
No.1 refused to admit or provide medical aid and had not even advised any
alternative. It is the case of the complainants that it is the
responsibility of the doctor to inform the patients attendants about
the disease and the alternative treatment to be provided for the same.
The complainant No.2 and the parents of the deceased took her to second
opposite party corporate hospital and they too have not admitted the
patient inspite of her serious condition and have not conducted any
pathological tests and by just looking at the report of Dr.Mallesham of
Thirmuala hospital gave treatment without diagnosing the disease of the
deceased.
(3.)The complainants submitted that opposite party no.1 had not taken proper
care in treating the deceased and neglected to conduct urine test to find
out protein urea particularly when she noted high blood pressure and
oedema of feet of the deceased and not conducted the pathological tests
while giving treatment to the deceased and had not admitted her in the
nursing home on 11-6-2004 when the deceased was suffering from severe
pain and her condition was critical. Opposite party No.2 was negligent in
giving treatment to the deceased inspite of her serious condition and had
taken the patient to ICU and there she was not closely monitored and
there was no nurse and Gynaecologist in opposite party No.2 hospital to
attend the patient and there were no standard resuscitative equipment to
review the patient and not even conducted post mortem examination on the
deceased to find out the cause of death and without any basis issued
death certificate stating that the cause of death is due to Cardio
respiratory arrest. Hence the complaint alleging deficiency in service
against the opposite parties and seeking direction to pay compensation of
Rs.12,00,000/-.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.