LAWS(PAT)-1959-8-20

SATYADEO NARAIN LAL Vs. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONERS

Decided On August 07, 1959
SATYADEO NARAIN LAL Appellant
V/S
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONERS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These are two applications under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act against the decisions of the Small Cause Court Judge decreeing two suits of the Bhagalpur Municipality for recovery of municipal tax in respect of two holdings. Defendants Nos. 1 to 3 are the landlords of these holdings and defendant No. 4 is the tenant under them. The landlords did not enter appearance, though duly served. Defendant No. 4 alone contested the suits. His defence was that the landlords were the owners of the holdings and were recorded in the Assessment List and the Demand Register, that he was a mere occupier and not an owner of the holdings and was never assessed with tax, nor was any demand made upon him and that he was, therefore, not at all liable to pay the taxes claimed in the two suits.

(2.) The learned Small Cause Judge overruled the defence and decreed the suits ex parte against defendants Nos. 1 to 3 and on contest against defendant No. 4. Now, the latter has come up to this Court in revision.

(3.) The facts as admitted by the witnesses for the municipality, about which there is now no longer any controversy, are these : The two holdings consist of culturable lands and are under crop. Defendants Nos. 1 to 3 in both the suits are the landlords of these holdings and defendant No. 4, who is the petitioner before us, is the occupancy raiyat and pays rent to them. He himself cultivates the lands and receives no rent from anybody else. The holdings contain no buildings at all. In the municipal records the landlords, namely, defendants Nos. 1 to 3, were recorded as the owners of the holding and their names appear both in the Assessment list and in the Demand Register. They have been paying municipal taxes so far. The petitioner was never assessed with municipal tax and his name was not mutated in the Assessment List and the Demand Register. He never paid any tax at all nor was any demand for tax made upon him before the institution of these suits. Subsequently, on the application of Sri Basant Lal and others and in exercise of the powers vested in them under Section 99(b) of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922, the Commissioners at a meeting on 31-7-1950, passed the following resolution :