JUDGEMENT
A. P. Sinha, J. -
(1.) This application is directed against the impugned order by
which the complaint of the petitioner has been dismissed under Section 203 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter called 'the Code').
(2.) The complainant petitioner had filed a complaint naming the members
of the opposite party as accused for an offence of murder. Opposite Party No. 1
was at the relevant point of time Sub-Inspector of Police at Mansi Out Post,
opposite party No. 2 was the Inspector of Police Khagaria and petitioner No. 3
Bashir Ahmad was the ASI (Jamadar) at Khagaria Police Station. According to
the case of the complainant, on 31-5-1980 at about 3.30 p.m., the complainant
alongwith one Sharan Yadav was returning to his village on a horse back from
Nawadah where they had gone to the house of cousin of Sharan Yadav. When
they had reached near village Garhiya, they saw the police officers, namely the
opposite party alongwith few other constables approaching towards them. When
the police party saw the complainant and Sharan Yadav, someone amongst them
shouted from the jeep. Out of fear the complainant and Sharan Yadav tried
to run away through fields. They had been chased by the police party. The
complainant and Sharan Yadav stopped their horses and got down. The opposite
party enquired about the names of the complainant and Sharan Yadav. When it
was disclosed to the police party and also when it was made known to them that
they belonged to village Chukti, the opposite party began to assault Sharan Yadav
with stick. Opposite Party No. 2 Sheo Shankar Prasad spoke that the
complainant and Sharan Yadav were men of Ram Sharan Yadav (M.L.A.) and
further said that it was the order of the Assistant Superintendent of Police
to shoot the men of Ram Sharan Yadav wherever they could be found. On
hearing this, the petitioner and Sharan Yadav tried to run away, but a constable
caught hold of the petitioner and when Sharan Yadav tried to fleed away,
opposite party No. 1 fired five rounds at him as a result of which he fell down
and died. The petitioner and the dead body of Sharan Yadav were brought to
the Khagaria Police Station on the said police jeep and the complainant petitioner
was sent to jail. Further according to the allegations, a criminal case was going
on between Ram Sharan Yadav and the Assistant Superintendent of Police,
Khagaria-Shafi Alam, as Shafi Alam had shot dead Har Ballav Yadav the younger
brother of Kam Sharan Yadav, and at the time of the occurrence the said case
was still pending. The complainant was confined to jail and could not file the
complaint then, but the same was filed on 11-6-1980. After filing of the
complaint, the complainant was examined on solemn affirmation and two witnesses
were also examined. Thereafter the impugned order has been passed.
(3.) It appears that the complainant had raised an objection that the
complaint was dismissed behind his back, and also motivatedly two of his witnesses
had not been examined. Learned Counsel for the complainant has contended
that it would appear that the complainant had supported the case and that being
so the dismissal of the complaint was contrary to law. Further it has been stated
that the Court below has committed an error in holding that sanction for
prosecution as contemplated under Section 173 of the Code of the opposite party
had not been obtained.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.