JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)HEARD the parties and perused the impugned order dated 11.10.2001 contained in Annexure -7.
(2.)A perusal of the said order shows that in Land Ceiling Case No. 1263/73 -74 the Additional Collector, Ceiling, Purnea on 11.10.2001 made a proposal for ignoring the order of Additional
Collector passed in the same proceeding on 21.12.89 purportedly under sections 37 and 47 of the
Land Ceiling Act. As per opinion of the Additional Collector, Ceiling in the impugnsd order, the
earlier order dated 21.12.89 was without jurisdiction. On this proposal the Collector of the district
gave his concurrence and acceptance on 23.11.2001.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the earlier order of the Additional Collector dated 21.12.89 as contained in Annexure -3 clearly mentions that it was being passed under
sections 37 and 47 of the Land Ceiling Act and the same was within jurisdiction because only
clerical and arithmatical errors were sought to be corrected on the basis of appellate order passed
earlier by the Additional Collector. It has further been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that a
quasi judicial order passed by Additional Collector on 21.12.89 cannot be simply ignored by the
Statutory authorities without challenging that order before the higher authorities in accordance with
law.
(3.)A perusal of the impugned order contained in Annexure -7 shows that the Additional Collector has based his recommendation upon the opinion of the Govt. Advocate to the effect that order
dated 21.12.89 was without jurisdiction and on such proposal the Collector of the district has given
his concurrence.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.