LAWS(HPH)-2011-12-178

SHASHI PAL Vs. STATE OF H.P. & OTHERS

Decided On December 01, 2011
SHASHI PAL Appellant
V/S
State Of H.P. And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD and gone through the record.

(2.) Petitioner was one of the several candidates for the posts of constables, which were advertised for Solan district. He cleared written examination as also the physical fitness test and was called for interview, along with several other candidates. Last candidate, who was selected from un -reserved category, to which category the petitioner also belongs, secured 73 marks in all. Name of that candidate is Parveen Kumar. This candidate was awarded 8.5 marks in viva voce test. Petitioner was awarded 6.33 marks in the viva voce test and his total score was 71.83. His grievance is that he had been awarded less marks in viva voce, with a view to eliminating him and selecting other candidates. So, he has filed the present writ petition, seeking issuance of a direction to the respondents to select and appoint him to a post of constable.

(3.) RESPONDENTS have filed reply in which it is stated that petitioner's score being less than that of the last candidate of his category selected and recruited, he has no right to be declared as selected for appointment.