STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. GUMAT RAM
LAWS(HPH)-2011-3-108
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Decided on March 11,2011

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Appellant
VERSUS
Gumat Ram Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. - (1.)THIS appeal by the State is directed against the judgment dated 1.9.2000 delivered by the learned Sessions Judge, Mandi in Sessions Trial No. 2 of 2000 whereby he acquitted the accused of having committed an offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter, referred to as the 'Act ').
(2.)THE prosecution story, in brief, is that on 23.11.1993, PW/8 ASI Subhash Chand accompanied by other police officials including PW/3 Sh. Harbans Singh, LHC was present in Aut bazar in connection with patrolling duty. The police party saw the accused in the bazar at about 7.15 a.m. when he was carrying a bag. The accused on seeing the police personnel tried to slip away towards Mandi town. This aroused the suspicion of the police officials who apprehended the accused. It was suspected that the accused may be carrying some contraband in the bag. The accused was informed that his bag was sought to be searched and his consent was sought vide memo Ext.PA. He was given an option as to whether he wanted to be searched by Subhash Chand, ASI or by a Magistrate or some other Gazetted officer.The accused allegedly agreed to give his search to the police officials vide memo Ext.PB in the presence of Dile Ram, PW/1 and Gulab Singh, PW/7, the independent witnesses.
Thereafter, search of the bag (Ext.P3) was carried out and below the garments, a polythene bag was found which contained charas. LHC Shanti Kumar was deputed to bring the scales and weights and he brought the same. The said charas was weighed and was found to weigh 2 Kgs. Two samples of 20 grams each were drawn out of the bulk charas and thereafter, the two samples and the remaining bulk charas were sealed in three separate parcels and sealed with seal impression 'D '. The entire charas was taken into possession vide memo Ext.PC. Personal articles of the accused recovered during the search were taken into possession vide memo Ext.PH. Thereafter, Rukka, Ext.PL was prepared and sent to Police Station, Aut for recording the formal FIR, a copy of which is Ext.PM. Special report, Ext.PT was sent to the higher authorities. Before the entire proceedings had ended, PW/9 Dy.SP Gurmeet Singh reached the spot and after verifying the facts, he again sealed the said parcel and seal 'S ' was affixed on the parcel. Thereafter, the case property as well as the sample seal impressions were kept in the police station and were sent to the Chemical Analyst in due course. Report Ext.PN was received wherein it was found that the sample contained charas and the resin content was found to be 31.46 per cent.

(3.)ON the basis of this material, challan was filed against the accused and the accused was charged with having committed an offence punishable under Section 20 of the Act. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The prosecution examined nine witnesses. After trial, the accused was acquitted. Hence the present appeal by the State.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.