BIMLA Vs. STATE OF H P AND ORS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petition has been filed with the following prayers:

(2.) It has been submitted that the petitioner is similarly situated, as the petitioners covered in Annexure P-4 judgment-Nepalis in whose case the judgment has already been implemented. In case the petitioner is similarly situated person, she cannot be discriminated. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law in light of the aforesaid judgment Annexure P-4 within one month from the date of production of copy of the judgment alongwith copy of writ petition. The learned Sr. Addl. Advocate General submits that the L is pending before this Court. The petitioner undertakes that she will abide by the outcome of the judgment rendered in LPA and the implementation may be made only subject to the outcome of the LPA The petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.