RATTAN SINGH Vs. MANGAT RAM AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition is directed against the order of the trial court dated 21.11.1988 whereby the application filed by the defendant -petitioner to allow him to file the written statement, was declined.

(2.) THE plaintiff filed a suit for declaration. The defendant -petitioner Rattan Singh was served and was proceeded ex -parte vide order dated 8.6.1987. For setting aside the exparte order application was filed on 19.8.1987, which was dismissed on 11.11.1987. The defendant moved the present application that he may be allowed to file the written statement as no written statement has been filed even by the other defendants. That application was contested on behalf of the plaintiff and the trial court declined the same with the observations that "he cannot be allowed to file written statement at this stage because the previous order of my Learned predecessor dated 11.11.1987 is still existing. No appeal or revision has been filed against the said orders and the parties are bound by the same.

(3.) AFTER hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties, I find merit in this petition. Order 9 Rule 7 CPC reads as under: