SALAHUDIN Vs. UNION TERRITORY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The parole plea of the petitioner-prisoner, a convict in case FIR No. 30 dated 19.2.2001 under Sections 302, 307, 398, 449/34 IPC and lodged in Model Jail, Chandigarh, was declined by the competent authority (respondent No. 2) vide order dated 10.10.2007 (Annexure A-2) by recording that

(2.) THE impugned order does not, at all, indicate what actually persuaded the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, to observe that the situation would worsen due to the release of the petitioner-prisoner on parole.

(3.) AT the time of arguments before this Court, leaned counsel appearing on behalf of the U.T., Chandigarh resists the plea by arguing that no medical certification in support of the averment (to the effect that the mother of the petitioner is aged 85 years and is ailing) had been filed by the petitioner-prisoner.