LAWS(P&H)-2008-5-84

HARDIAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Decided On May 01, 2008
HARDIAL SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CRL . Misc. No. 88238 of 2007 : This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 35 days in filing the revision petition. It has been asserted in the application that as petitioner No. 1 was away to pilgrimage tour, the present revision petition could not be filed in time. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 35 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. Crl. Misc. stands disposed of. Criminal Revision No. 1809 of 2007 :

(2.) THIS criminal revision is directed against the order dated 25.5.2007 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bathinda, whereby charge against the petitioner under section 436 read with Section 34 IPC has been framed. The FIR registered against the against the petitioners reads as under :-

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners has also placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Raj Singh v. State of Haryana, 2003(2) RCR(Criminal) 697 to contend that Chappar does not come within the definition of building and charge under Section 436, IPC is not made out if any damage is done to chappar.