SATYA PAL SHARMA Vs. SMT. SATWANT KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The challenge made in the Letters Patent Appeal is against the order passed by the learned Single Judge allowing a modification/reviewing the order dated 11.11.2002 on 18.03.2005. The order, which was passed by learned Single Judge on 16.11.2002, was to the following effect:

(2.) It is not in dispute that the controversy involved in these cases is squarely covered on facts as well as on law by a judgment of the Division Bench rendered by this Court in CWP No. 1402 of 1995 decided on December -,1995 titled Dharamvir v/s. State of Haryana and Anr. Learned Counsel appearing for the parties have also agreed that in fact the aforesaid controversy in Dharamvir's case supra has also arisen from the same advertisement and the selection process as is involved in the present cases.

(3.) The Division Bench while allowing the aforesaid Writ Petition has observed as follows: