SATISH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioners challenge the acquisition proceedings in this writ petition. According to them, they are owners of land comprised in Khasra Nos. 120/19-22, 133/2 and 120/12 Min. measuring about 17 kanals 12 marlas.

(2.) MR . R.C. Setia, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners relying on the site plan Annexure P/4 submitted that when the respondents either release or not taking steps to acquire the entire land in and around the petitioners' land, they are not justified in proceeding with the acquisition of the petitioners' land. He also contended that in the matter of land acquisition, petitioners cannot be discriminated.

(3.) IN the light of the above pleadings, we considered the rival contentions.