(1.) Vide order dated 4.3.2005, evidence of the petitioners was closed by order. Counsel for the petitioners states that against them a suit for declaration was filed, wherein respondent-plaintiff has claimed possession on the basis of ownership. Counsel states that if the petitioners are not allowed to conclude the evidence, they shall suffer an irreparable loss. It has further been stated that the petitioners need only one opportunity to complete their evidence. Trial is stated be pending on 21.3.2006 and if opportunity be granted to the petitioners, they shall complete their evidence to the said date.
(2.) Prayer made vehemently has been opposed by the counsel appearing for the respondent.
(3.) This Court feels that rules procedure are handmaid of justice to enhance the same and not to subvert it.