LAWS(P&H)-2006-7-227

PYARE LAL Vs. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Decided On July 14, 2006
PYARE LAL Appellant
V/S
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) (Oral).

(2.) NOTICE of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner claims himself to be an oustee and as such entitled to allotment of plot under the oustee s quota. He claims that after the acquisition of his land, he had applied for allotment of the aforesaid plot, although a long period had elapsed but the necessary relief to the petitioner has not been granted so far. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the record of the case, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive representation within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received,before the Estate Officer,