VINOD KUMAR Vs. KALAWATI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is tenant's revision petition against whom the eviction order has been passed by both the authorities below.

(2.) THE landlady Shrimati Kalawati, widow of Sher Singh, sought the ejectment of the tenant Vinod Kumar from the first floor of the house, in dispute, situated in Vakilan Bazar, Hissar. His ejectment therefrom was sought inter alia on the ground that she bonafide required the building, in dispute, for her personal use and occupation and that there was change of user thereof in-as-much as the tenant had started office therein. Both the authorities below however found that there was changer of user thereof by the tenant and that the landlady required the same for her own use and occupation bonafide. Consequently, the eviction order was passed against him. Aggrieved against the same, he has come up in revision to this court.

(3.) AFTER hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in this contention. This contention raised on behalf of the petitioner has been negatived by both the authorities below. A firm finding has been given by the Appellate Authority that two rooms, bath room and a kitchen on the first floor are under the tenancy of the petitioner and if he was allowed to use the latrine on the barsati floor, it could at the most be said that he was doing so with the consent of the landlady, but it did not mean that the portion on the barsati floor was under his tenancy. Thus, I do not find any merit in this contention.