GRAM PANCHAYAT DEKA FATEH SINGH TEHSIL GULHA, DISTRICT KARNAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE brief facts of the case are that vide notification No. EP -KKT -63/91 dated 29th November, 1963, issued under section 4 of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), a Sabha area for the village of Gumthala Garhu including the area of rectangle numbers 1 to 301 by the name of Gram Sabha Gumthala Garhu was constituted under section 5 of the Act. Some population of the village due to congestion moved out and established six habitations at a distance of four miles from the main village. These six habitations are situated within a radius of one mile. It is stated that the residents of six deras were included in Gram Panchayat Gumthala Garhu. Some time afterwards, residents of six deras made an application to the Government for constituting a separate Gram Sabha for them. Consequently, the Punjab Government vide notification No. EP -65/211 dated 16th November, 1965, excluded the area of rectangle numbers 1 to 121 out of the Sabha area of Gram Gumthala Garhu and by notification No. EP -65/212 of the same date, the Government constituted a new Sabha area consisting of the six deras previously in village Gumthala Garhu, and established a Gram Sabha for this area by the name of Gram Sabha Dera Fateh Singh. Rectangles Nos. 1 to 124 were given to the new Sabha and excluded from the old Sabha. Copies of these notifications are attached with the petition as Annexures 'A' and 'A 1'. Elections to this new Panchayat took place in April, 1966, and petitioner No. 2 was elected as a Sarpanch to which office he still continues to hold. Gram Sabha Gumthala Garhu filed Civil Writ No. 366 of 1967 challenging the notifications (Annexures 'A' and 'A -1') but the same was dismissed as infructuous by this Court on 13th January 1969 in view of a compromise dated 5th February, 1968, entered into between Gram Sabha Gumthala Garhu and Gram Sabha Dera Fateh Singh. Accordingly to the compromise the income of the Panchayats land reserved for the income of the Panchayats was to be divided between the Panchayats in the ratio of 1/3 : 2/3. One -third was to go to Gram Sabha Dera Fateh Singh, the present petitioner, and two -third to Gram Sabha Gumthala Garhu. Dispute still continued between the two Panchayats. The Block Development and Panchayat Officer, respondent No. 5 issued a letter (translated copy is Annexure 'B') in which the petitioner was directed to send a copy of Aks Shajra in duplicate after getting the same prepared from the revenue patwari in respect of Shamilat land belonging to the two Panchayats, that is, Gram Sabha Gumthala Garhu and Gram Sabha Dera Fateh Singh, for the purpose of partition. Another letter (Annexure 'E') was issued by the Block Development and Panchayat Officer to the petitioner in which it was mentioned that re tangles 66 & 83 of the area belonging to the petitioner Gram Panchayat Treasuring about 35 acres would be taken out from the Panchayat and given to Gram Panchayat Gumthala Garhu and that the petitioner would be only left with 20 acres 1 kanal and 13 marlas out of 55 acres. This letter is dated 17th March, 1972. It was against these two letters of the Block Development and Panchayat Officer that the present writ was filed by the petitioner. This writ was admitted on 26th March, 1973 and during the pendency of writ petition, two notifications were issued on 19th June, 1973 which are Annexures 'F' and 'F -1'. Vide these notifications, part of the land belonging to petitioner -Panchayat detailed in the notifications was given to respondent No. 7 after taking the same out of the ownership of the petitioner -Panchayat. The petitioner -Panchayat was subsequently allowed to file an amended petition in view of later notification and by the amended petition, the petitioner -Panchayat as challenged the notifications (Annexures 'F' & F. 1') alongwith the letters (Annexures 'B' and 'E').

(2.) THE main contention of the Learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the land comprised in rectangle Nos. 1 to 124 having been given to the petitioner -Panchayat in the year 1965 when the Panchayat was constituted under the Act, that land could not be taken away now by the Government and given to the Gram Panchayat, Gumthala Garhu, that the respondents had no jurisdiction to partition the land without notice to the petitioner. I have carefully given my thoughtful consideration to the contentions raised by the Learned Counsel for the petitioner and the reply made by Shri Wasu, Learned Counsel for respondent No. 7 and the State counsel Shri Mehtani. The impugned notifications have been issued under section 4 of the Act which is in the following terms : - -

(3.) MR . Wasu, Learned Counsel for respondent No. 7, has vehemently contended that area includes land and under sub -section (2) of Sec. 4 any area can be excluded or included from the Sabha area and in this regard he has referred to section 19 of the Punjab General Clauses Act. I am afraid section 19 of the Punjab General Clause Act can be of no assistance in the facts of this case. It would lead to disastrous consequences if sub section (2) of section 4 is construed in a manner as Mr. Wasu win's to construe it. In this regard, it is necessary to refer to section 4 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, which is in the following terms: - -