PARDHAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUMMONS with regard to Harminder Singh have been received back with the report that he has refused to accept service on the ground that his mother was not well and that he would not be able to appear in Court on account of this fact. It is, therefore, apparent that the respondent has been served.

(2.) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.

(3.) ON July 22, 1994, notices were issued to the respondents for August 3, 1994 and though the Advocate General, Punjab was served, the accused could not be served. On August 3, 1994 dasti notices were ordered to be served to respondent No.2 and direction to that effect was also issued to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana. As already mentioned above, notices have been served in the manner indicated.