BALWINDER SINGH @ BAKU Vs. HARWINDER KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this civil revision petition filed invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, order dated 3.8.2013 passed by Additional District Judge Jalandhar in HMA No.25 of 2013, vide which maintenance amount to the tune of Rs.12,000/ - to the applicant and Rs.6,000/ - to the minor son per month, with direction to pay Rs.5,000/ - as litigation expenses is directed to be paid by the husbandpetitioner , has been challenged, alleging this order to be illegal and arbitrary and thus, not binding on the petitioner.

(2.) IT is claimed that the petitioner -husband is only an employee in a restaurant wherefrom he is getting salary, which when converted into Indian currency, comes to Rs.35,000/ - per month only and being 40% disabled, he is neither in a position to earn more nor is able to spare more than Rs.10,000/ - for the wife and the child.

(3.) HEARING has been provided to Counsel for the parties.