LAWS(P&H)-1993-5-111

BIMAL DEEP KAUR Vs. THE STATE OF PUNJAB

Decided On May 26, 1993
BIMAL DEEP KAUR Appellant
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) On 16th Feburary, 1990, an advertisement was issued by the Principal, Government Medical College, Patiala inviting applications from the Medical Graduates, as well as from the members of the P.C.M.S.-II Registrars, and Demonstrators for admission to the Postgraduates courses in the State Medical Colleges in the State of Punjab. The petitioner, who was member of the P.C.M.S. Class II service, applied for admission to the M.D. Course in Obeterics and Gynaecology against the 60% seats reserved for the in-service candidates. It is the case of the petitioner and not denied by the respondents that the petitioner's name figured in the waiting list next below the nemo of one Dr. Rupinder Sandhu for admission to the course in Obestetrics & Gynaecology. It is further the case of the petitioner that when the seat in the Postgraduate Medical Degree Course in the speciality of Obestertics and Gynaecology was offered to Dr. Rupinder Sandhu. She did not join the same and the seat remained vacant. However, the respondent - Authorities did not offer the seat to the next person on the waiting list, i.e. the petitioner. This led the petitioner to file the present writ petition.

(2.) The Motion Bench while issuing notice of motion on 30th October, 1990, gave the following interim directions regarding provisional admission to be granted to the petitioner :-

(3.) The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner being next on the waiting list to Dr. Rupinder Sandhu, had a right to be offered the seat which had fallen vacant due to the non-joining of Dr. Rupinder Sandhu. He further submitted that it is by now well settled that in the Educational Institutions, especially in professional Colleges, seats should not go a begging. He also highlighed that in fact the petitioner had not usurped anybody's right. In fact, by virtue of the interim directions of this Court, the petitioner had completed her entire course and had also taken the annual examination held in December, 1992.