LAWS(P&H)-2021-7-232

SIDDHARTH UPPAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On July 29, 2021
Siddharth Uppal Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Matter has been taken up through video conferencing via Webex facility in the light of the Pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions.

(2.) Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.55 dated 30.04.2019, under Sections 406, 498-A, 323, 506 IPC, 1860, registered at Police Station Women Gurgaon, District Gurugam and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).

(3.) Fir in question was got registered by complainant-respondent No.2 namely, Diksha Verma and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from Compromise Deed, annexed as Annexure P-2. On the basis of the compromise, the petitioner is praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exercise and an abuse of process of the Court and thus, the FIR in question and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed in the interest of justice.