ROHTAS SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner is seeking quashing of the adverse remarks and the consequential order at annexure P/6 and the appellate order annexure P/8. The remarks annexure P/6 are conveyed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police to the Superintendent of Police vide letter dated 19.1.1993. The said remarks are as under :

(2.) The remarks are for the period from 6.8.1991 to 31.3.1992. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the said remarks of Superintendent of Police and the Deputy Commissioner which he has reproduced in para 9 of the petition. They are as under :

(3.) The above remarks are for the same period i.e. 6.8.1991 to 31.3.1992. There was an annonymous complaint against the petitioner and a preliminary enquiry was conducted. The report of the preliminary enquiry is annexure P/5 dated 2.7.1992. The regular departmental enquiry was conducted against the petitioner and in the same he was exonerated. The charges in the preliminary enquiry against the petitioner were as under :-