(1.) The only grievance of the petitioner is that respondent has wilfully disobeyed the orders dated 8.8.1988 by issuing instructions dated 21.8.1989 for refixing the pay of the petitioners, withdrawing the benefit of increments from the date of the Civil Writ Petition.
(2.) Direction of the Hon'ble Court runs as under :
(3.) The learned counsel for the respondent has refuted the contention and contends that according to the order, the respondents have been restrained from recovering the amounts already paid and not from stopping the illegal increments given and it was found by the Court that the increments were illegally granted in violation of the rules.