THE ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Vs. SRI BHARAT SARING
HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission
Sri Bharat Saring
Click here to view full judgement.
AJIT BORTHAKUR,J. -
(1.) Heard Mr. Nalo Pada, learned standing counsel, Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission(APPSC), appearing on behalf of the review petitioner. Also heard Ms. Nikita Danggen, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-writ petitioner.
(2.) By this review petition preferred under Chapter X of the Gauhati High Court Rules, read with Order 47, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the petitioner Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC) has sought for review of the relevant paragraphs of judgment and order, dated 08.01.2018, passed by this Court in WP(c)356(AP)2012, on the grounds, inter alia, that the submissions of Mr. Pada, learned standing counsel, APPSC, has been misquoted by the Court, inadvertently, while writing-out the judgment.
(3.) Mr. Pada, learned standing counsel, APPSC, submits that on the day of hearing of the matter i.e. on 08.01.2018, he had specifically made an averment that neither, he, nor, the Commission ever suggested for re-evaluation of the answer scripts of the petitioner, as has been reflected in the judgment and order, dated 08.01.2018. Mr. Pada, also submits that on the said date, while relying on the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the APPSC, he stated that there is no system in place for re-evaluation of the answer script of the examinee(s) as per the APPSC Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2012. Mr. Pada, further submits that on 08.01.2018, he had stated that as per the additional affidavit filed by the writ petitioner(respondent, herein) in the said writ petition, he had only acceded to the petitioner's prayer for calling of the original records of the petitioner as well as of some other selected candidates, for perusal/verification by this Court.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.