JUDGEMENT
M.V.MURALIDARAN, J. -
(1.) These Anticipatory Bail Applications involves issues of great public importance pertaining to the importance of individual's
personal liberty and the society's interest because every criminal
offence is the offence against the State. The order granting or
refusing bail must reflect perfect balance between the conflicting
interests, namely, sanctity of individual liberty and the interest of the
society. The law of bails dovetails two conflicting interests namely,
on the one hand, the requirements of shielding the society from the
hazards of those committing crimes and potentiality of repeating the
same crime while on bail and on the other hand absolute adherence
of the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence regarding
presumption of innocence of an accused until he is I found guilty
and the sanctity of individual liberty.
Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of these anticipatory applications are recapitulated from the Status Report filed by the Investigation Officer as follows :
A case has been registered on 24.03.2018 at Vigilance and Anti Corruption P.S.Manipur, Imphal against the petitioners/accused persons namely Shri O. Ibobi Singh , the then Chairman LDA, Shri Th. Ibobi Singh, the then Project Director. LDA, Shri CH. Gojendro Singh, the then Project Direct Director, LDA and others based on a complaint report filed by Shri Khuplen Lhouvum, Addl.Supdt. of Police, Vig. and AC Department alleging therein that during the Enquiry case No.2/SP-V and AC/2018 the following facts are revealed.
(2.) The Loktak Development Authority (LDA) which includes the then Chairman, LDA Shri O. Ibobi Singh the then Chief Minister of
Manipur' the then Vice Chairman LDA, Shri Th. Debendra Singh,
the then Minister Forest & Envt. Shri Ch.Gojendro Singh, the then
Project Director (Member Secretary, LDA) and others took a
decision in a meeting held on 05.09.2008 without any consent of a
cabinet or other members of LDA in which M/s Progressive
Construction Ltd (PCL) Hyderabad was allowed to execute a work
for removal of Phumdi on Loktak Lake without calling any tender on
trial basis as Departmental work by the LDA through M/s
Progressive Construction Ltd (PCL) against the CPWD norms at the
estimated cost of Rs.3,06,10,000/- (rupees three crores six lakhs
ten thousand only) which clearly indicates favouring M/s
Progressive Construction Ltd (PCL) Hyderabad by abusing their
official position.
(3.) That, Shri Chiranjeevi, the then Project Director M/s PCL submitted his proposal letter dated 05.08.2008 to the Project
Director, LDA on the same day in which the meeting was held as
mentioned above. It further revealed that M/s PCL submitted the
proposal-letter to the LDA without any corresponding letter from
LDA. The proposal letter of M/s PCL was accepted by
Shri.Gojendro Singh, the then Project Director, LDA.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.