HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
Click here to view full judgement.
Ramalingam Sudhakar, CJ. -
(1.) Heard Ms. Puspa Gurumayum, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Kh.Athouba, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.
(2.) This application has been filed for condonation of 581 days in the filing the review petition to review the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench dated
28.5.2010.The petitioner is the respondent No.5 in the Writ Appeal No.87 of 2009.
(3.) In the final judgment of this Court in its order dated 28.5.2010, it is recorded in para No.5 that respondent No.5, despite proper service of notice,
did not choose to appear. Therefore, the appeal was heard on merits and the
appointment of the applicant was quashed. The appellate order went against
two other persons as well. In the writ appeal, the prayer of the appellant Shri
Th.Ojenkumar Singh, the unsuccessful writ petitioner was accepted and the
following order was passed in para No.19 as under:-
"19. Resultantly, the impugned judgment and order dated 16.11.2009 passed in W.P(C) No.91 of 2009 is interfered with and Accordingly, the notification dated 15.12.2008 issued by the MPSC relating to the recommendation of the private respondents 3, 4, and 5 ishereby set aside. Consequently, the appointment of the private respondents 3, 4 and 5 as Lecturers of Government College in Computer Science is quashed. The State Government is at liberty to requisition for fresh recruitment process for filling up the post of Lecturers in Government Colleges in Computer Science, if so advised. The appeal is allowed. No order as to costs." ;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.