JUDGEMENT
MV MURALIDARAN,J. -
(1.) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in relation to the impugned
order dated 12.09.2016 passed by the second respondent and
consequently, direct the respondents to consider the case of the
petitioner for appointment to the post of Inspector of Co-operative
Societies in the Co-operative Department under the sports
meritorious scheme without further delay in view of the direction
given in W.P. (C) Nos.19 of 2007 and 632 of 2013 by relaxing the
age and also having regard to the continuous process of
appointment on direct recruitment against available vacancies.
(2.) The case of the petitioner is that he is a graduate degree holder in Economics and is an outstanding National player in the
discipline of Hockey. He had participated in many National
championships organized by different states in the country,
representing the State of Manipur as a player as well as coach of
State of Manipur. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by
filing W.P. (C) Nos.19 of 2007 and 632 of 2016 praying inter alia for
considering his case for appointment to the post of Inspector of Co-
operative Societies in the Co-operative Department under sports
quota. The said writ petitions were disposed of by directing the
respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to
the post of Inspector of Co-operative Societies under sports quota.
However, the respondents have not considered the case of the
petitioner and issued the impugned order dated 12.09.2017 stating
that he cannot be considered for appointment to the post of Inspector
of co-operative societies. Challenging the same, the petitioner has
filed the present writ Petition.
(3.) Resisting the writ petition, the respondents filed affidavit-in- opposition stating that the process of adjustment of Inspectors of Co-
operative Societies, who were holding the supernumerary post to the
vacant original posts of Inspector of Co-operative Societies, is not
related with direct recruitment. It is part of the process of streamlining
MGEL of the Department and no direct recruitment can be made
unless ban on direct recruitment is lifted. It is stated that the
department has no mala fide intention while issuing the speaking
order stating that the petitioner cannot be considered for
appointment to the post of Inspector Co-operative Societies. The
HSLC Examination Certificate of the petitioner shows date of birth of
the petitioner as 19.02.1967. On 18.08.2016, that is the month prior
to the issuing of speaking order and notification of advertising the
posts, the petitioner was aged 49 years and 6 months.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.