NAYEK ASSOCIATE ALIAS NAYEK PAPER AND BOARD MILLS Vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
LAWS(CAL)-1983-6-10
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on June 14,1983

NAYEK ASSOCIATE ALIAS NAYEK PAPER AND BOARD MILLS Appellant
VERSUS
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES Respondents

JUDGEMENT

G.N.Ray, J. - (1.) This writ petition is heard as a contested application and is directed against an order dated 20th August, 1982 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Durgapur, in Case No. 15/81-82 affirming the order dated 25th August, 1981 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Asansol Circle, rejecting the application for issue of eligibility certificate under the provisions of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954 and the Rules framed thereunder. The petitioner, M/s. Nayek Associate alias Nayek Paper & Board Mills is a registered partnership firm and the petitioner No. 2 is the partner of the said partnership firm. The said firm is a registered dealer under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act and the said firm was registered as a small-scale industry under the Government of West Bengal. The State Government issued a Notification No. 1809-F.T. dated 15th April, 1976 under Section 4AA of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954 and the said notification was subsequently amended by another Notification No. 1658 dated 1st April, 1980. Under the said notification, an assessee is entitled to the certificate of eligibility under which he will not be required to pay sales tax for the period specified in the said notification provided the following conditions are fulfilled : (i) the newly set up small-scale industrial unit is registered with the Government of West Bengal, (ii) the investment of the dealer on plant and machinery excluding land and building does not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs, (iii) the dealer starts production for the first time after 31st March, 1976, (iv) the dealer keeps separate accounts in respect of such. newly set up small-scale industrial unit, issues serially numbered cash/credit memos, for sale of goods manufactured in such industrial unit, keeps vouchers and other documents for purchases of plant and machinery for establishment of such industrial unit and maintains other records to prove that sales claimed exempt under this clause were of goods manufactured in such an industrial unit set up by him and that no amount by way of tax under the Act has been realised by him in respect of such sales, and (v) the newly set up small-scale industrial unit is not established solely or substantially with the plant or machinery of another newly set up small-scale industrial unit which earlier availed of the exemption under this notification and which is not engaged in the business of manufacturing such plant or machinery.
(2.) It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had invested a sum of Rs. 8,18,586.92 on 16th April, 1980 for the plant and machinery required for the purpose of setting up a paper mill. It is the admitted case of the petitioner that besides the said investment for the plant and machinery, the firm had to incur other expenses for installing the said plant and machinery and if the installation charges are also included within the costs for the plant and machinery then the total cost will be more than Rs. 10,00,000. The first production of the petitioner-firm started sometime in April, 1977 and the first sale of the products of the petitioner-firm also commenced sometime in May, 1977. On 23rd May, 1977 the petitioner-firm applied for eligibility certificate before the Commercial Tax Officer, Burdwan Range, for three years. The petitioner contends that the Commercial Tax Officer, Burdwan Range, did not dispose of the said application for eligibility certificate of the petitioner and as one of the conditions for issue of the eligibility certificate is that the assessee will not realise any sales tax from the customers, the petitioner-firm also did not realise any sales tax on the sale of the products manufactured by the petitioner-firm. It appears that on 7th March, 1980 after about three years, the Commercial Tax Officer, Burdwan Range, asked the petitioner to show cause why the petitioner-firm should not furnish a security for Rs. one lakh for the grant of the eligibility certificate. On 27th April, 1981 the petitioner-firm again applied for the eligibility certificate before the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Asansol Circle, for seven years in view of the fact that by a subsequent notification the State Government extended the period of tax holiday for a period of seven years. Such notification was issued on 1st April, 1980 by the State Government. By an order dated 12th January, 1981 the Commercial Tax Officer, Burdwan Range, dropped the proceedings against the petitioner-firm demanding security of Rs. 1,00,000 under Section 5(1)(c) of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954 and the said order is annexure C to the writ petition. On 25th May, 1981 the Commercial Tax Officer, Burdwan Range, completed the assessment for the period, 4th quarter of 1384 and 1385 B. S., inter alia holding that the petitioner-firm was not entitled to get the eligibility certificate as the total investment on plant and machinery of the petitioner-firm was more than Rs. 10 lakhs and the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Asansol Circle,, also rejected the application for eligibility certificate of the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter made an application for revision before the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the said decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Asansol Circle, rejecting the application for eligibility certificate and the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Durgapur, also rejected the said revisional application affirming the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Asansol Circle.
(3.) In the instant writ petition the said decision of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes rejecting the revisional application and affirming the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Asansol Circle, rejecting the application for eligibility certificate is under challenge. It appears that at the hearing before the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes the petitioner-firm referred to the decision of the Government of India, Ministry of Industries and Civil Supplies, and the press note issued in that regard which were circulated by the State Government. Such decision of the Central Government including the notification and the press note by which the definition of small-scale industries and small-scale ancillary industries were revised, have been made annexure E to the writ petition. It appears that such decision of the Central Government was made sometime in May, 1975 and in the press note, certain clarifications and explanations on the definition of "small-scale industries" were published. It appears from the press note issued by the Government of India that the costs of equipment such as tools, jigs, dies, moulds and spare parts for maintenance and the cost of consumable stores will be excluded in computing the value of plant and machinery. Similarly, the cost of installation of plant and machinery will also be excluded. The petitioner-firm contended before the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes that after the said decision of the Central Government as noted in the press note which was circulated by the State Government, the notification under Section 4AA was issued by the State Government and in the said notification one of the conditions for the eligibility certificate is that the investment of the dealer on plant and machinery excluding the cost for land and building will not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs. The petitioner-firm contended that as actual investment on plant and machinery did not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs, the petitioner was entitled to the exemption under Section 4AA on the basis of the notification issued by the State Government and the costs of installation charge should not be included in computing the costs of plant and machinery. The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, however, did not accept the said contention of the petitioner-firm inter alia on the ground that although in the press note issued by the Government of India costs of installation of plant and machinery were not to be included in calculating the value of plant and machinery but the said guideline provided for in the press note was relevant for determining whether a particular industry was a small-scale industry or not and in the present dispute as to whether or not the costs of installation would also be included in the computation of the total investment in plant and machinery, the said guideline was not at all relevant. According to the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, the expression "investment of the dealer on plant and machinery excluding land and building" has a comprehensive import and such expression is unambiguous and clear and does not admit two interpretations. The intention of the notification is not to extend the benefit of tax holiday to all and sundry small-scale industrial units and it was not the intention of the press note that simple registration of a small-scale industrial unit with the small-scale industries department of the Government of West Bengal ipso facto will earn a tax holiday. The use of the expression "excluding land and building" in the notification issued by the State Government for grant of eligibility certificate by necessary implication means that excluding the costs for land and building all other costs are to be included. A plant is to be viewed in its totality and de hors installation there is no plant. Accordingly, the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was of the view that besides the actual value of the plant and machinery the entire costs of intallation charges are to be included for computing the investment in plant and machinery and viewed from that angle the petitioner-firm had admittedly invested more than Rs. 10 lakhs and as such the petitioner-firm was not entitled to the eligibility certificate and the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was justified in rejecting the application.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.