JUDGEMENT
N.K.Sodhi, Presiding Officer (Oral) -
(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the order dated October 28, 2010 passed
by the adjudicating officer imposing a monetary penalty of Rs. 8 lacs on
the appellant for delaying the demat requests received from its
shareholders. According to the adjudicating officer, there is a delay of
almost 2000 days whereas the appellant contends that the delay is only of
about 1270 days. Be that as it may, all the requests for
dematerialisation of the shares held in physical form have been executed
and all the shares in the physical form have been dematerialized. The
appellant admits that there has been a delay in dematerializing the
shares and it has furnished some reasons which appear to us to be
genuine. The appellant became a sick company and was before the Board for
Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) for quite sometime. We are
informed that the promoters of the appellant company had taken adequate
steps to comply with the conditions laid down by BIFR and that the scheme
framed by BIFR has since been implemented. The appellant is no longer a
sick company. It is also on record that the company had approached the
Honble High Court for a scheme under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act for reconstruction and also under Section 100 of the same
Act for the reduction of its share capital. The proceedings remained
pending in the High Court for sometime and the schemes have since been
approved. It is on account of the pendency of the aforesaid proceedings
that the requests from the shareholders for the dematerialisation of
their shares got delayed. Now that the shares have been dematerialized,
the wrong committed by the appellant is no longer continuing. In these
circumstances, we are of the considered view that the amount of penalty
levied on the appellant needs to be reduced considerably. Having regard
to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case and while upholding
the impugned order, we reduce the penalty to 2 lacs. The impugned order
stands modified accordingly.
The appeal stands disposed of as above. No costs.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.