Decided on March 09,2022

Rashamoy Ghosh Appellant
Swapna Ghosh Respondents


Arindam Lodh, J. - (1.)At the request of learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the following substantial questions of law have been formulated:
(i) Whether the findings given by the courts below while deciding the plaintiff's claim that they are legal heirs of deceased owner of the suit land is perverse?

(ii) Whether the findings given by the learned appellate court while deciding the issue no. (v) i.e. story of possession and dispossession over the suit land are perverse and based on no evidence?

(iii) Whether the certificates of death of late Nibashi Ghosh and Ajit Ghosh are valid in the eye of law in view of sub-sec. (3) of Sec. 13 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969?

(2.)Heard Mr. SS Debnath, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Bhattacharjee and Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel for the respondents.
(3.)This is a second appeal preferred by the original defendants challenging the judgment and decree dtd. 1/6/2018 passed by the learned District Judge, Unakoti Judicial District, Kailasahar in case No. Title Appeal 20 of 2013 arising out of the judgment and decree dtd. 27/6/2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kailasahar in case No. Title Suit no. 45 of 2012.

Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.