LAWS(MPH)-2010-11-30

SUMAN SINGHAI Vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

Decided On November 08, 2010
SUMAN SINGHAI Appellant
V/S
DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has questioned the legality and validity of the warrant issued under Section 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

(2.) Short facts, briefly stated giving rise to the instant petition, are that Petitioner carries on business of sale and purchase of ornaments of silver and gold. Petitioner deals in the business of manufacturing of silver and gold ornaments in the name and style of Singhai Jewellers and is regularly assessed to income tax and has permanent account number. Petitioner is also registered dealer under the provision of Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002.

(3.) During course of routine checking by G.R.P., Katni, Petitioner's employee, namely, Kamlesh Soni was found to be in possession of impure silver weighing 54.078 kg. with pure silver content of 33.738 kg. and cash of Rs. 16,50,000/-in an Indica Car bearing registration number M.P.-13/T-5331. Police authorities submitted intimation to the Income Tax Department. On the basis of the information given by the police authorities a warrant of authorization dated 5.12.2008 under Section 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued. Authorised officer executed the warrant under Section 132A of the Act. He was informed by G.R.P. Katni that the assets were in possession of CJM, Katni and, therefore, GRP, Katni was not in a position to handover the assets to the income tax authorities. Petitioner submitted an application (Annexure-P/5) dated 2.12.2008 for release of assets before CJM, Katni. Income Tax Department also made application for release of assets in its favour. Both the applications were decided by the CJM vide order dated 24.1.2009. Application preferred by Petitioner was rejected. However, application preferred by the department was allowed and it was directed that assets be handed over to the income tax department on furnishing security to the tune of Rs. 26 Lacs. Against the aforesaid order revision has been filed by the Income Tax Department which is pending before District and Sessions Judge, Katni. Petitioner has assailed the warrant of authorization issued under Section 132A of the Income Tax Act though this petition.