JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This Civil Revision Petition is filed against
the order, dated 09-07-2009, made in
I.A.No.1868 of 2008 in I.A.No.1007 of 2008 in
O.S.No.641 of 1996 on the file of the Principal
Junior Judge, Tirupati.
(2.) The petitioner herein filed the said
application under Order VIII Rule 3 read
with Section 151 CPC to permit him to file
the documents mentioned therein, receive
and admit the same. In support of the said
application, the petitioner filed an affidavit
stating that he has filed an application to
set aside the ex-parte decree passed against
him in O.S.No.641 of 1996 vide judgment
and decree, dated 12-03-1997, by the
Principal District Munsif, Tirupati. He has
also filed an application to condone the delay
in filing a petition to set aside the ex-parte
decree and, therefore, he wanted to file the
said documents and accordingly, he sought
permission to file the said documents.
(3.) The said petition was filed under
Order VIII Rule 3 CPC. Order VIII relates to
written statement, set-off and counter claim.
The suit itself has been decreed preliminarily
by judgment and decree, dated 12-03-1997.
Therefore, it cannot be said that the suit is
pending. The suit is pending only for the
purpose of passing final decree. If that be so,
I am of the opinion that none of the
provisions under Order VIII are applicable
to the case on hand. Further, Order VIII
Rule 3 CPC relates to specific denial of the
averments in the plaint. Therefore, the said
application filed by the petitioner is not
maintainable and the same is liable to be
dismissed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.