JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This civil revision petition is at the instance
of the respondents 1 and 3, who are the
Judgment-Debtors aggrieved against the
order passed by the V Junior Civil Judge, City
Civil Court, Hyderabad in E.A.No.12 of 1986
in O.S.No.1775 of 1973 under which the
delivery of the E.P., Schedule property was
ordered to the petitioners/decree holders.
(2.) The respondents 1 to 6 herein are the
petitioners in the E.P., seeking execution of
the decree passed in O.S.No.1775 of 1973,
dated 15-11-1978. In the E.P., the schedule
property sought to be delivered was 16 acres
23 guntas in old Sy.Nos.113, 114 and 125/3,
corresponding to new Sy.No.93/1 of Thokatta
village of Hyderabad Urban Taluk, Hyderabad
district. The E.P., was filed on 22-4-1986.
Later, an amended petition was filed on
6-10-1999 seeking the very same relief, but
it is not known why the amended E.P. was
filed.
(3.) The objection to the execution petition
as per the counters, which are referred to in
the impugned order, is that the suit was filed
for only 16 acres 10 guntas in Sy.No.93/1 for
possession by ejectment and for payment of
arrears. In the counters it was stated that an
extent of 12 acres 23guntas in Sy.No.93/2
has already been acquired from the decree
holders and an award was also passed.
Therefore, no useful purpose would be served
by ordering possession, and, therefore,
sought to dismiss the Execution petition. It is
also further stated that Judgment-Debtor No.3
filed an additional counter stating that the suit
was filed basing on old survey numbers 113,
114, 125/3 in respect of an extent 16 acres 23
guntas. In the absence of any clear
boundaries to the extent, it is difficult to
identify the old survey numbers. The entire
land .covered by the old survey numbers is
under the defence occupation. Therefore,
the claim of the decree holders is baseless.
The Executing Court, however, appointed a
Commissioner, who is a retired Assistant
Director of Survey & Land Records, and
basing on the report of the said Commissioner,
allowed the execution petition and ordered
delivery of possession of the land in question.
Aggrieved by that, the Judgment Debtors
have come up with the present revision.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.