JUDGEMENT
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. -
(1.) A 1 and A2 in S.C.No.520 of 2010 on the file of the VI
Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Markapur, Prakasam
District, filed this appeal feeling aggrieved by the judgment, dated
07.05.2012, rendered therein. The trial Court found the accused guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC i.e., of
causing the death of the deceased i.e., Chintaginjala Nagaraju, on
06.11.2008, and sentenced both of them, to undergo imprisonment for life, and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/ - each, in default, to undergo
Simple Imprisonment for two months respectively. Hence, this
appeal.
(2.) A 1, and the deceased are related to each other. PW.2 is the younger brother of A1. The deceased, and PW.3 are the sons of
PW.2. All of them are residents of Chimakurthy Village of
Prakasam District. One Sri Venkata Pathy, is junior paternal
uncle of PW.2 and A1. The said Venkatapathy is said to have
gifted a house site of Ac.0.05 cents to PW.2. A1 is said to have
been dissatisfied with the conferment of the entire benefit to his
brother, PW.1, alone. He is said to have warned PW.1 and his
children i.e., the deceased, and the PW.3, that unless a share is
given in the property to him, he would not keep quiet. The
mediation in this behalf, is said to have failed. The marriage of
PW.3 was said to have taken place on 8.11.2008.
On 06.11.2008, A1 is said to have taken the help of A2, and both of them, have proceeded on motor cycle i.e., Yamaha
Gladiator, bearing No. AP 27 AA 3173, said to have been borrowed
from PW.9. They are said to have called the deceased, through a
coin box telephone, to go to a particular place, so that they can
meet, and discuss certain matters. The deceased is said to have
acceded to the request, and all the three are said to have
proceeded on the motor cycle, towards Markapur, and they are
said to have consumed liquor. After crossing Podili, A1 and A2,
are said to have caused the death of the deceased, near Veligonda
Chalivendram, within the limits of Markapur Village. The dead
body is said to have been first noticed by PW.1, Village Revenue
Officer, on 07.11.2008, at about 3.00 p.m., and he submitted a
report at 7.30 p.m., in Konakanamitla P.S. Unable to identify the
body, the police is said to have simply registered a case in Crime
No. 67 of 2008. No person was mentioned as accused. The photo
of the deceased person is said to have been published in the
newspaper, on 08.11.2008. On seeing the news item, PWs.2 and
3, and another are said to have come to Markapur Village, and identified the dead body, as that of late Nagaraju.
(3.) DURING the course of inquest on the body, PWs.2 and 3, are said to have suspected the involvement of A1. Thereafter, the dead
body was sent for postmortem. Taking note of the mention of A1,
in Ex.P3, i.e., the inquest report, the police altered the provision in
the FIR, and investigation was taken up.;